Fortune Rabbit Review: Five Tiles to Pay, Ten Positions to Fill
Fortune Rabbit is a three-reel PG Soft slot with one rule that matters. Gold prize tiles land on any spin, and when five or more show on the ten-position grid their printed values are added and paid. The feature is eight spins of that same rule with the lines removed, triggered at random, with nothing to buy and nothing to retrigger. Across 2,624 paid demo spins at 6.00 the session returned 127.65% on its stakes, and fifteen feature rounds paid 3,507.00 between them. The largest base-game hit in the run beat fourteen of those fifteen rounds on its own. The one figure the build never prints is the return, which the studio publishes on its own site and in a downloadable sheet instead.
- Who it suits: players who want one rule they can count on screen, prize tiles that pay in the base game as well as in the feature, and no meter to fill
- Core mechanic: prize tiles printing 0.5x to 500x that pay their sum when five or more land on the ten-position grid, and a random feature of eight spins on tile-only reels
- Key risk: the build prints neither its 96.75% return nor a trigger rate, both come from the studio's sheet, where the 0.77% feature row is left undefined and one spin in 130 is our reading of it, and the 5,000x cap needs ten top tiles on one screen
- Rating: 6.8/10
Game Information
129.02% tested, pooled on paid spins
152x tested, largest logged outcome (all sessions)
Where the stated figures come from
| Figure | Value | Source | Checked | In the tested build |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stated RTP | 96.75% | PG Soft game card and Game Information sheet (PDF, version 1.0.r3, updated 8 July 2025): 71.51% base game plus 25.24% feature (sheet (PDF)) | sheet read 16 September 2026 | No: the 27 info screens price every tile and never mention RTP |
| Advertised max win | 5,000x | Loading screen ('win up to 5,000x') and in-game rules (any spin whose total reaches 5,000x ends); the Game Information sheet lists the same theoretical maximum | build as logged on 2 August 2026 | Yes: loading screen and rules |
| Volatility | Medium | PG Soft Game Information sheet, session volatility: engaging (medium) (sheet (PDF)) | sheet read 16 September 2026 | Not read from the build for this review |
| Bonus trigger | Random, on any spin: 8 Fortune Spins with prize tiles only | In-game rules, restated value by value on our rules page (rules page) | build as logged on 2 August 2026 | Yes: printed in the rules |
| Feature frequency | 0.77% | PG Soft Game Information sheet, frequency table: a row the sheet does not define; one spin in 130 is our reading of it (sheet (PDF)) | sheet read 16 September 2026 | No: the build prints no trigger rate |
Where a figure is our reading of a source, the row says so. Live RTP is the operator's choice: check the info screen where you play.
One rule, printed twice
Fortune Rabbit runs on a grid of ten positions, three rows on the outer reels and four on the middle one, with ten fixed lines across it. The line game is ordinary and small, and it isn't the reason anyone opens the build. The other half of the machine is a prize tile, a gold plaque with a cash value printed on its face. The rules give it a single sentence: when five or more prize tiles show anywhere on the grid, their values are added up and paid. Four tiles pay nothing, whatever they print, and that clause is the whole difficulty of the game. The tiles can land on any spin, in the base game as much as in the feature, and their values run from half the stake to 500 times it.
The feature is that same rule with the lines taken away, and nothing more elaborate than that. On a random spin the game announces the Fortune Rabbit Feature and awards eight fortune spins. For those eight spins the reels hold nothing but prize tiles and empty cells. There is no scatter to collect, no meter to fill, no button to buy the round and no retrigger inside it. The loading screen sells the top of this arrangement, prize symbols up to 500x and a win of up to 5,000x. The arithmetic behind the second figure is short: ten positions holding the top tile pay 500x each, and the rules end any spin whose total reaches 5,000x.
The arithmetic of five
Five of ten is the whole design, so it deserves a slow reading. Our session ran at 6.00, and at that stake the tiles on our reels printed 3.00, 6.00, 12.00, 30.00, 60.00, 120.00, 180.00, 300.00, 600.00 and 3,000.00. A spin that lands five of the cheapest pays 15.00, two and a half bets, and no paying tile spin in this game can pay less. A spin with one 600.00 tile and four small ones beside it pays a little over a hundred bets. A spin with a 3,000.00 tile and four blanks pays nothing at all, which is the one real cruelty in the design. The value on a tile counts only once the count is met. A board carrying a 3,000.00 plaque and three companions is therefore one of the quieter sights in the game.
The rules print the values and stop there, which is the first of several silences. Nothing on the 27 info screens gives the odds of a tile landing, the weights behind the values, or the rate at which the feature fires. The studio's site does the pricing the build declines to do. The game's card there lists 96.75% and a 5,000x maximum, and the downloadable Game Information sheet lists the feature at 0.77% in a frequency table it does not define. I would expect the high plaques to be weighted thin, because a feature that filled ten cells with 500x tiles at any real frequency couldn't run at a playable return. The sample agrees with that expectation: the 3,000.00 tile crossed our reels on several occasions and never sat inside a paying five. What a log can measure is how often the count is met and what it paid when it was, and the rest of this review is that measurement.
The base game, counted
The line game underneath is priced like a fruit machine, and it reads like one too. Three of a kind is the only line win on a three-reel grid. At 6.00 a row pays 120.00 for three rabbit wilds, 60.00 for the golden bunny, 30.00 for the bag of gold and 6.00 for the red packets. The coins, the firecrackers and the carrot pay 3.00, 1.80 and 1.20, less than the stake in every case. The rules print those as coefficients from 200 down to 2, multiplied by the bet size and the bet level rather than by the whole stake. A wild line is therefore worth twenty bets and not two hundred, at any stake. Both of the network's sister pages read that coefficient as a multiple of the stake, and the arithmetic above is the correction. Ten lines can pay at once, so a screen of wilds is worth 200x in theory, and no such screen appeared in the log.
Across the run the base game took 2,624 paid spins and paid something on 587 of them, a hit frequency of 22.37%. The flat stretches were short by this shelf's standards, the longest no-win run lasting 37 spins, and most of the hits were small change. Of the 581 paying spins outside the feature, 302 returned less than the stake and 103 returned between one and two bets. Another 73 sat between ten and twenty-five bets, which is where the golden bunny and the wild lines live. Eight paid between fifty and a hundred bets, and one paid more. The last of those is the second largest event of the whole session, and the feature had nothing to do with it. Five prize tiles landed on an ordinary spin, printed 30, 60, 600, 12 and 30, and paid 732.00 straight into the base-game balance. The amount is 122 bets from one ordinary spin, outside the feature, on a board that had shown nothing special a second earlier. The lines on this machine keep the meter ticking; the tiles do the paying, in both halves of the game.
Eight spins of the same lottery
The feature fired fifteen times in the run, once per 175 paid spins on average. The gaps between triggers ran from ten spins to 586, with no pattern I could defend. Two pairs of rounds arrived within twenty spins of each other, and one silence lasted the length of a short session on its own. A random trigger looks like that from the chair, and the one printed rate, the sheet's 0.77% or about one spin in 130 on my reading of it, runs a little faster than our one in 175. Each round settles as one total when the eighth spin ends, not spin by spin. The payouts below are therefore the change in balance from the moment the triggering stake left the wallet to the moment the total was banked. Six of the fifteen triggering spins paid something in the base game of their own accord. The game folds that amount into the round's total on screen, so the table does the same.
| Round | Trigger spin | Balance at trigger | Round payout | Payout ×bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | 99,904.60 | 201.00 | 33.5x |
| 2 | 178 | 99,922.60 | 78.00 | 13.0x |
| 3 | 309 | 99,899.20 | 246.00 | 41.0x |
| 4 | 336 | 100,028.20 | 174.00 | 29.0x |
| 5 | 464 | 100,035.40 | 177.00 | 29.5x |
| 6 | 1,057 | 100,872.40 | 762.00 | 127.0x |
| 7 | 1,234 | 101,378.80 | 63.00 | 10.5x |
| 8 | 1,501 | 101,509.00 | 15.00 | 2.5x |
| 9 | 1,518 | 101,464.00 | 270.00 | 45.0x |
| 10 | 1,856 | 102,739.60 | 108.00 | 18.0x |
| 11 | 1,948 | 102,905.20 | 264.00 | 44.0x |
| 12 | 2,052 | 103,350.40 | 195.00 | 32.5x |
| 13 | 2,352 | 103,055.80 | 102.00 | 17.0x |
| 14 | 2,404 | 103,399.00 | 255.00 | 42.5x |
| 15 | 2,664 | 103,968.40 | 597.00 | 99.5x |
| 15 rounds | one per 175 paid spins | 3,507.00 | 39.0x average |
Balance at trigger is the wallet figure after the triggering spin's stake was taken, and each payout is what the wallet gained between that moment and the round's close. The six rounds whose triggering spin paid on its own carry that amount inside the payout, exactly as the on-screen total did. All fifteen payouts reconcile against the session ledger to the cent, trigger to close.
The table has one round worth a second look and one worth a shrug. Round six paid 762.00, or 127 bets, and nearly all of it arrived inside two spins. The meter read 672.00 with six spins still to run, 762.00 with five, and nothing changed after that. Round eight paid 15.00, which is five of the smallest tiles once, and the rest of its spins were blanks. Between those two ends the median round paid 195.00, or 32.5 bets, and the mean 233.80. A feature that arrives every 175 spins and pays 39 bets on average returns about a fifth of the stake through the feature door. The proportion is consistent with a base game priced to carry most of the return itself. Inside the log the split came out at 16,598.40 from the base game outside the feature and 3,507.00 from the fifteen rounds.
Three sessions, and a pool that adds up
The SlotLab testing team holds three Fortune Rabbit ledgers, and one of them is this portal's, under Session ID FRBT-20260802-01. Two were logged in June on the network's dedicated Fortune Rabbit sites, both at a flat 6.00 with every round arriving on its own. All three publish complete stake and return totals, so for once the pool is arithmetic rather than diplomacy. Counted on paid spins, the way the sister logs count theirs, it comes to 39,597.00 returned on 30,690.00 staked across 5,114 spins, a combined 129.02%. Twenty-nine rounds sit inside that pool, one per 176 spins on average across the three logs. The largest single outcome of the three logs, 152 bets, belongs to the session at fortunerabbitplay.com rather than to mine, and the round that held it paid at least that much.
| Source | Spins | Observed return | Feature rounds | Best result | Net result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CasinoReview.click | 2,624 paid | 127.65% | 15, one per 175 | 127x, full round | +4,355.40 |
| fortunerabbitplay.com | 1,240 | 138.6% | 11, one per 113 | 152x, single outcome | +2,874.60 |
| fortunerabbitslots.net | 1,250 | 122.36% | 3, one per 417 | about 110.5x, single outcome | +1,677.00 |
| Combined | 5,114 paid | 129.02% | 29, one per 176 | 152x, single outcome | +8,907.00 |
The portal's line counts paid spins and their stakes, 15,750.00 staked and 20,105.40 returned. The ledger behind it also records each fortune spin with its stake handed back inside the same entry, 636.00 on both sides, and reads 126.58% on that basis, as the session report shows. The two sister lines repeat what their pages print and count paid spins only. The Combined row divides the three return totals by the three stake totals.
CasinoReview.click Erik Lindholm's log · August 2026
fortunerabbitplay.com Mia Stone's log · June 2026
fortunerabbitslots.net Alex Reeves's log · June 2026
Consistent with a random trigger, the clock disagreed with itself across the three logs. One site saw eleven rounds in 1,240 spins, the other three in 1,250, and this portal fifteen in 2,624 paid spins. All three sessions closed ahead, which says something about June and August and nothing about the maths. The three returns share a direction and little else, which is the usual shape of three short samples. Whereas a pool of this size can describe what a round tends to pay, it can't pin down how often the round comes. A rate that moved between one in 113 and one in 417 is the loudest statement in the data.
FRBT-20260802-01 · Evidence retained: 8,029 timestamped frames plus the full session log. Read the session report: FRBT-20260802-01. Frames beyond its tables are available on request through the contact form.
The return figure, and where it isn't
No return figure exists anywhere a player can read it from the chair, and that absence is the first fact about this game. The 27 info screens of the build price every symbol and every tile and never mention RTP. The studio's site carries a card for the game with the RTP and the maximum win on it, 96.75% and 5,000x. The full breakdown is one download away. PG Soft's Game Information sheet for the game, version 1.0.r3 and last updated on 8 July 2025, puts the theoretical return at 96.75%. It splits that into 71.51% from the base game and 25.24% from the feature, and its frequency table puts the feature at 0.77% without saying what the row measures. The 96.75% attached to this game everywhere else comes from that sheet by way of database listings. It's the same arrangement PG Soft runs on Speed Winner and Forge of Wealth, and it earns the same mark against it here. Our session returned 127.65% on its paid stakes over 2,624 paid spins, and the pool 129.02% over 5,114. Neither is the game's long-run rate; they are three warm samples from a distribution nobody has published. A casino chooses the configuration it runs, so the binding figure is whatever the info screen of your own copy shows. If it shows one at all.
Editor's note: reading the RTP numbers. Stated RTP for this title comes from PG Soft's own site, where the game's card lists 96.75% and the Game Information sheet, a PDF, gives the breakdown; the tested demo build prints no return line in its rules, so neither confirms the RTP configuration of the build we logged. Our tested figure is the pooled return of the three logged demo sessions behind this review, calculated by money as total returns over total stakes on paid spins, 39,597.00 over 30,690.00, and the CasinoReview session alone returned 127.65% on its paid stakes. Our ledger also records each fortune spin with its stake handed back inside the same entry, which adds 636.00 to both sides of the raw totals and reads 126.58% before that amount is set aside; the sister logs count paid spins only. Even a pooled sample of a few thousand spins is not the game's long-run maths. Live RTP is an operator choice: many games ship in several RTP configurations and the casino picks which one to run, so always check the RTP in the game's info screen before you bet real money. More in our guide to stated vs observed RTP.
Speed Winner, the studio's other clock on this shelf
The nearest comparison on this portal is Speed Winner, the other PG Soft machine here whose return sits on the studio's site rather than in the game. The two games spend their randomness differently, and the difference is the whole comparison. Speed Winner adds multiplier tiles into one total and applies it to a cascade, so its rounds compound, and its best logged round paid 841.15x. Fortune Rabbit adds tile values into one total and pays it flat, so its rounds are sums, and the largest logged outcome across three sessions paid 152x, the best complete round on this portal 127x. Speed Winner's natural trigger ran once per 230 paid spins in our clean log, among the slowest we have measured. Fortune Rabbit's ran once per 175, above a base game where one spin in four and a half pays, against one in just under four on Speed Winner. Whereas Speed Winner earns its 7.2 for a mechanism you can watch at work, Fortune Rabbit's mechanism is a count to five, honest without being deep. Both leave the return in the dark, and the mark for that is the same on both pages. The two logs are set side by side, figure by figure, in Fortune Rabbit vs Speed Winner.
What the ledger suggests
- Budget by the count, not by the feature, because tiles pay in the base game as well. The biggest base-game hit of the run beat fourteen of the fifteen rounds, and a stake sized only for the wait between features misreads where the money came from.
- Treat a round as thirty-odd bets until it proves otherwise, because that is what the median said. The median round paid 195.00 at our stake, three rounds paid under 100.00 and two paid over 500.00. The 5,000x figure needs ten top tiles on one screen, and the top tile never joined a paying five in 2,624 paid spins.
- Read the 129.02% as three sunny afternoons, because the pool is honest arithmetic on real totals and still a sample. Three logs can't price a random trigger whose rate moved between one in 113 and one in 417, and they don't try to.
- Free play and paid play share the 18+ rule, and every figure on this page came out of demo play.
The demo, the rulebook and the sister logs
The portal runs its sessions on the public provider demo for a single reason: a demo run leaves a ledger that can be published whole. A game whose only printed promise is a maximum needs one more than most. The Fortune Rabbit build opens inside the page on our shelf, in the same public demo the log ran on. Two more Fortune Rabbit logs sit on the network's dedicated sites, with a playable build on each. Mia Stone at fortunerabbitplay.com logged the eleven-round session that holds the 152x outcome. Alex Reeves at fortunerabbitslots.net logged the three-round session that waited 417 spins per trigger. Figures from both sites are quoted as their pages stood at the time of writing.
The prize tiles land in front of you on the Fortune Rabbit demo page, the same build behind my 2,624 paid spins. Every other tested build is one card away on the Demo Shelf.
The line paytable at 6.00, the tile rule and the bet formula sit on the Fortune Rabbit rules page, next to the screens they were read from.
Fortune Rabbit FAQ
What is the RTP of Fortune Rabbit?
None of the build's 27 info screens carries a return figure. PG Soft's own site lists 96.75% on the game's card, and the studio's downloadable sheet splits that into 71.51% base game and 25.24% feature; the configuration a casino runs is its own choice, so the info screen of your copy is the place to look. The portal session came back at 127.65% across 2,624 paid spins and the three-session pool at 129.02%, both samples rather than the game's long-run rate.
How does the Fortune Rabbit Feature trigger?
At random, on any spin, with no scatter symbol and no meter. The game announces the feature while the reels are turning and awards eight fortune spins on which only prize tiles and blanks appear. The build prints no trigger rate. The studio's sheet lists the feature at 0.77% in its frequency table, a row the sheet never defines. The table's rows add up, main game plus feature equals the top line, so I read the feature row as the share of spins that fire it, one in 130 or so. Our log recorded fifteen features in 2,624 paid spins, and the two sister logs eleven in 1,240 and three in 1,250.
What do the prize symbols pay?
Each prize tile carries a printed value between 0.5x and 500x the stake. The tiles pay only when five or more of them show on the grid at once, in which case all of their values are added and paid. Four tiles pay nothing, and the rule holds in the base game as well as in the feature. The best base-game spin of our log, 732.00 at a 6.00 stake, came from five tiles landing outside the feature.
How do you win 5,000x on Fortune Rabbit?
By filling all ten positions with the 500x tile, since ten times 500x is the cap, and the rules end any spin whose total reaches 5,000x. The 500x tile appeared on our reels several times and never inside a paying five. The largest outcome in our three logged sessions paid 152x, on a sister site's log, and the best complete round on this portal 127x.
Is there a bonus buy or a retrigger?
Neither. The feature can't be bought, the eight fortune spins cannot be extended, and the round ends when the eighth spin settles. Every one of the 29 rounds in our pool arrived on its own, which is the only way a round can arrive in this game.
Can I play Fortune Rabbit for free?
Yes. The public PG Soft demo runs on a virtual balance inside the page on our Demo Shelf, with the same 27 info screens a tap away. A hundred spins will show you the tile rule and the pace of the lines. The 18+ rule covers free play exactly as it covers play for money.
My reading
Fortune Rabbit is a machine with one rule, and the rule is honest: five tiles pay their sum, on screen, in both halves of the game. I rate it 6.8, below Speed Winner and a fraction above Royal Joker, and the marks it drops are for what the build declines to print. The return and the feature rate live on the studio's site and in its downloadable sheet rather than in the game, and nothing anywhere weights the tiles. The 5,000x cap has one route, ten top plaques on one screen, and nothing in three logs came near it, which is a report and no part of the charge. What remains is a base game that pays small change on one spin in four and a half. The feature arrives every couple of hundred spins and pays thirty-odd bets more often than not. Three logs all ran warm without telling you why, and the fourth may not. Play it for the count, which you can watch, because the build in front of you prices neither the return nor the feature, and nobody prices the tiles.
Corrections and updates
- Sep 15, 2026. The median feature round was misstated as 201.00, or 33.5 bets. The sorted list of fifteen payouts gives 195.00, or 32.5 bets, as the session report already showed.
- Sep 15, 2026. Session and pooled returns are now counted on paid spins, the way the sister logs count theirs, which gives 127.65% on 2,624 paid spins for this portal's session and 129.02% on 5,114 paid spins for the pool. The first version read 126.58% and 128.43% on ledger entries that included 105 stake-neutral fortune-spin entries, and the pool's trigger rate now reads one per 176 spins, previously one per 180. The session report discloses both entries that went through at 12.00.
- Sep 15, 2026. The 152x result from fortunerabbitplay.com is labelled as its page describes it, a single fortune-spin outcome, rather than as a complete round. The best complete round on this portal's log remains 127x.
- Sep 15, 2026. PG Soft does publish the return. Its site lists 96.75% on the game's card, and its Game Information sheet, a PDF (version 1.0.r3, updated 8 July 2025), splits that into 71.51% base game and 25.24% feature and gives a 0.77% feature hit frequency. The first version said the studio printed no return figure anywhere and that its game card showed a dash; what stands is that the build's 27 info screens carry none. The rating rationale now names the build rather than the studio, and the score is unchanged. The sheet's feature row, 0.77%, is now quoted as the sheet's own figure, and the one-in-130 conversion is marked as our reading of a row the sheet does not define.
- Sep 16, 2026. The 0.77% feature row is now described the same way in the quick verdict, on the rules page and on the demo page: the sheet's figure, in a table the sheet does not define, with one spin in 130 as our reading of it. Two sentences in the body that still called it a printed frequency were reworded to match.
- Sep 16, 2026. The Speed Winner comparison now carries that session's corrected figures, one natural trigger per 230 paid spins and one paying spin in just under four, after a stake error in the Speed Winner log was found and fixed. The comparison's conclusion is unchanged.
- Sep 16, 2026. The count of feature rounds under 100.00 read four in the closing notes; the registry lists three, at 78.00, 63.00 and 15.00. The sentence now says three, and no total or median moved.
- Sep 17, 2026. The closing section now says in words that the distance between three logs and the 5,000x cap is a report and no part of the charge. The deductions were and remain for what the build declines to print, and the score is unchanged, in line with How we score.
Report an error: use the contact form and mention Fortune Rabbit and Session ID FRBT-20260802-01.
Former studio-side game mathematician: paytables and RTP models, now checked from the player's side. Full profile and method →